To maximize performance in elite winter sports, considerable effort has been made to find gliding surfaces, which decrease snow friction to a minimum. Shifting away the focus from elite sport to mass winter sport equipment, this study aimed to evaluate materials providing acceptable gliding performance and in the same time high structural strength. Therefore, we investigated wet and dry snow friction of known engineering polymers with different surface configurations. Static and kinetic friction coefficients (COF) on snow of twelve gliders made of different polymers were measured on a linear friction tester placed in a cold chamber. Of each polymer, two gliders were built and tested: one with a smooth surface, another one with a stone grinded surface. Roughness parameters and dynamic contact angles were measured to characterize the surfaces. Dry and wet snow samples were prepared by grinding ice into powder followed by sieving, compressing and natural snow sintering. The snow surface temperature was measured before each experiment with a pyrometer. Liquid water content was generated directly before each experiment by applying infrared light. COF on wet and dry snow were correlated with mean Ra-values and mean contact angles. Mean static COF ranged from 0.05 to 0.375 on dry, and from 0.133 to 0.674 on wet snow. On dry snow, only a moderate negative relationship between static COF and contact angle was found (rpearson = -0.6), whereas on wet snow a strong negative relationship was found (rpearson = -0.92). Static COF and Ra showed a moderate relationship only on dry snow (rpearson = 0.62). Excluding HDPE and ABS, smooth samples showed distinctly lower static friction than structured samples. The study showed that snow friction is a complex interplay of surface topography, hydrophobicity and mechanical properties, especially on wet snow. The typical texture for HDPE ski bases did not sufficiently decrease snow friction of the tested engineering polymers. On wet snow, hydrophobicity was the most important factor for good gliding. On dry snow, surface roughness had a stronger influence than hydrophobicity. Snow had clearly the strongest influence on the polymer - snow friction because it is a highly variable material with quickly changing physical properties.
See Institutional Repository DORA